Do All People Have Worth?
Let's start out by first stating that there is nothing better or worse, superior or inferior, about loners or herd - as these words are being used here. Some folks are one, some the other; actually most people are more or less one AND the other at any given time. The more harsh sounding lines in this missive were taken from an essay I wrote to get some Marxists supremely angry - and oh, they got angry, alright. So if the words enflame you - just have a glass of water and cool off :)
Much has been written by many on the Lone Wolves versus the Herd. Yet wolves are not loner animals
at all: sharks are and the herding instinct seems to be quite normal for all mammals.
When the herd sees these essays, some wannabe-lone-wolves somehow think that loners are "better."
Of course, real loners would never bother to read such essays because they are doing "their
OWN THING." Real loners don't tend to think in terms of "better/worse." Odd, isn't it?
There have been loners, however, who had to read essays about "lone wolves" in college for class assignment:
Phil Marsh is one who had to read these and he wrote his own very short essay on loners versus
herd giving this a new perspective: one that NONE OTHER ever gave the issue -- an INNER perspective.
He called what some people do "clinging." Clinging is not to be confused with a normal bonding instinct. A bonding instinct is more like what the
herd, or pack has when they are normal human beings. Clinging is more like psychic vampirism: but, to the
loner, clinging and some forms of bonding FEELS the same if someone else DOES IT TO them and doesn't
stop. It begs the question, "Is what this person is doing the same as nobmal bonding?" Probably not!
Real loners are not arrogant in their loner-ness; they are usually quiet people, to themselves.
They can be boisterous and very friendly if they see something they LIKE, and join in for the
fun of it; but they REMAIN aloof when the fun is over. The loner goes home, or goes back INTO
himself; whereas the clique that was having the fun remains a clique. Non-loners NEVER UNDERSTAND
the loner. They might think he is a snob, or shy; they might think he became aloof due to something
one of their clique did or said. They DO NOT understand that the loner RETURNS only TO HIMSELF.
He might have all the fun in the world with this clique and with other cliques, but he has REALLY
NO INTEREST in anything ELSE about the clique, wants nothing from that clique; doesn't care about
the personal lives of the clique members. He might associate for 2 weeks and never know if anyone
of the clique members is married or not, or what they eat, or what they do in bed. It just NEVER
COMES UP. The loner tends to feel and think that "other things" are quite irrelevant
to the fun at hand into which he has jumped to play. He feels this. He doesn't judge it or think
Often the herd does think that loners that return to themselves are arrogant if they don't think
that something was done to make the loner turn away. All of this is projection because the herd
CAN NOT UNDERSTAND the loner. Loners are people who, quite simply, HAVE TO HAVE time alone. LOTS
of it. They don't want to wake up in the morning with THE OTHER PERSON "THERE" -- or
live all day with the other person "THERE." They do not need to have a person BONDED
to them and they experience such bonding as IMPRISONMENT! They don't look for everything in one
person who is "their other half" because they are not half to begin with. They do not
tend to have ONE friend (the best friend), they tend to have quite a few friends, but none of
them are bonded. They MIGHT have only one friend for a long time if no other interesting person
is around. But there is nothing to HOLD the loner to that one friend. Two loners hanging around
are two loners alone. Loners tend to NOT get along with the herd because herd does what Phil Marsh
pointed out [See Marsh's article "Klippoths vs. loners"]. Tolerant herd people just
accept that the loner "has a HOBBY he loves."
Obviously, some whole ethnic groups are more bonding than others; some are known to be far more aloof than others. Usually, these qualities are stereotyped and the two ethnic groups tend to grate on each other. This phenomena is far more well-known! Some people tend to think Germans are cold. My ethnic group thinks Germans are too bondish (HA!) and Germans tend to think we are cold. Then again, many Germanic type people see Italians and such as "way too emotional and too close." One group is not better than the other. However, people do tend to think their own group is the best! :)
Let me jump ahead to something that might sound like the heights of arrogance. First of all,
history shows us that agriculture is a bust: it sucks, it doesn't work. Hunters/gatherers never
ran into the problems that agricultural types ran into, AND had more free time to play and MAYBE
Of note: my own people were NEVER farmers. If not nomads living "on the road" WITH their
herd of food (animals) -- a food that easily manages to sustain itself without much care, my people
were performers, soothsayers, middle-men in business, and other jobs connected with specifically
city-dwellers and cosmopolitan living.
Agriculture doesn't work and has never worked because the populations that did it tended to over-breed
and ended up with starving descendants and ruined land. In the interim, their agricultural activities
led to the inevitable CLASS system and the rest of the tiresome despicable POLITICS that arise
from the UNFAIRNESS OF this class system and all the cheating and lying that goes along with it.
So just before everyone starves, there is WAR. This happens over and over! Can't they learn?
There they are, still, today, leaned over with bent back shoveling that dirt, raking it, planting
on it; dawn till dusk, slaves to it and worrying about the weather and crops they have to watch over
with bated breath; the same thing day in and day out; never moving or DOING anything else. They
seem to have NO LIVES save that they EXIST. Get up, eat, work the land, eat, sleep. And, of course,
as they eat, eat, eat, they keep MAKING MORE people: more kids, more farm-hands. This leads to
needing MORE LAND for MORE WORK and MORE KIDS. They EXIST. Like CLUMPS OF MATTER they just make
MORE MATTER and wreck the OTHER MATTER in the ecosystem in their wake. You can hear them on T.V. today telling
the same sorry story they had to tell thousands of years ago: we are so hungry, we are so poor,
we have SO MANY CHILDREN. Yet I see that NONE of them, NOT A ONE, has A LIFE. They have no "THINGS
OF THEIR OWN" to do. They talk about nothing, they think about nothing, they ARE nothing.
Clumps of matter making MORE matter. History shows, with many of these populations, that they
eventually GOT ONE IDEA. Wow!
ONE IDEA! The idea was to elect one of their number, or allow one of their number with the most
land, to become their KING. They also got the notion that this King was Divine. Nomadic, hunting
populations, business-city populations NEVER DID this: they never had any King in particular (even
if they DID have a community leader) nor did they ever tend to see a person as Divine. Agricultural
populations ALL did this. The next thing they did was spend their not-so-free time BUILDING large
structures and wrecking the surrounding forest to do it: FOR THEIR DIVINE KING! They turned themselves
willingly into slaves of their own elected God-Kings. Then, not long after, these populations/cultures
DIED -- VANISHED at times. All of their dying and vanishing came slowly and painfully: sickness
and starvation and warfare preceded it, or they got conquered by stronger people doing the same or similar things.
The agricultural populations NEED TO HAVE herd bonds -- especially family bonds. To "CHANGE,
BE DIFFERENT" is anathema to the statis quo that eats up the land.
Christians often went into non-agricultural areas and "taught" people agriculture,
interfered with the native eugenic population-control measures, and created the MESSES we have
today in overpopulated areas. Christians have the insane notion that the land is infinite, that
they can "sow and reap" forever. Yet their own eyes should tell them that this is WRONG.
Not only is the land wasted, but their own waste (human waste) is a problem for them: where to
dispose of it. Polynesians did this agricultural stupidity on Easter Island: now all barren where
once were dense forests. Other Polynesians did NOT do this. Mayans did it and ended up "vanished."
MANY groups did this.
One can go to Mexico and see people living again where once were Mayans. The land has finally
come back. Yet there they are doing it all over again on the same land. HEAPS of people. The Mexican
government tries to get rid of them as "illegal settlements" and tells them to go into
the rain forest. Some of them do and there they BURN IT DOWN and continue doing the same STUPID
What do any of these people have to say? Nothing. "It's a nice day today.
The cow is sick. It's raining out. Someone just had ANOTHER baby." Etc. They are nothing
people with nothing lives doing nothing of their own except eat, sleep, shit, piss, fuck, and
work another day. And starve. And tho they are starving, they KEEP MAKING MORE KIDS. And some FOOL organization
goes and gets money to FEED THEM MORE so they can go and make MORE starving kids.
OH! But they are just natural animals, like any other animals, just doing normal animal things. (Note that calling humans animals is not an insult in Satanic philosophy where man is just another kind of animal, too)
REALLY? Animals do not starve themselves out of existence! Cats can be seen to HANG OUT with other
cats. They have a lot of leisure in their lives to lounge around and think their cat-thoughts.
Snakes can be seen doing this too, tho they tend to hang-out alone and lounge. One can see monkeys
doing this, too. They don't overpopulate themselves, they DO play a lot and they lounge in trees
"talking" to each other. Dolphins often play games with boats and they definitely play
with each other. Agricultural humans seem to be identical to dysfunctional ANTS in the way they operate: and
the WORST of the type even gets into the COLONIAL interfering we know so much about now. They
can be seen now on T.V. with sorrowful faces and BIG eyes (hungry eyes) begging for HELP: the
mother with her 20 children "so poor and so hungry."
I tend to think: "Kill your kids, bitch." "STOP MAKING MORE KIDS! GET STERILIZED.
KILL THEM before or right after they are born." Harsh? They seem to want to mimic ants: well,
ants would do this! OH! It is positively MONSTROUS of me to say this and REALLY FEEL THIS WAY.
Yet I can get to feeling this way when I see 20 kids, and one more on the way and some starving people moaning about how hungry they are. They are like PESTS (insects), out of control, laying WASTE to the damned
land which produces oxygen WE ALL NEED TO BREATHE. They are burning up MY AIR and giving back
NOTHING worth a shit. USE PESTICIDE ON THEM.
The planet earth ITSELF has an immune system, probably to be used against the one CANCER that
can be seen on the planet: MAN. Ebola is one such immune response: the Virus from Hell. I theorize
that AIDS is the earth's immune response since the disease undoes the immune system in man --
a system that the EARTH ITSELF EVOLVED IN man over millions of years. It isn't just gays who get
it anymore: STRAIGHTS ARE. One whole continent is beplagued by AIDS now. It was also originally a disease ONLY IN straights, tho few people
know about that. There are MANY things "out there" that can KILL man.
The Amerinds of North and South America, who ALSO often messed up with agriculture, were not
conquered by white men. Fact is, the Aztecs beat the crap out of Cortez even though they were
outnumbered and out-weaponed! MEASLES AND SMALL-POX is what conquered these Amerindians.
Today there are powerful pharmaceutical companies that WANT things that can only be gotten from
these rain forests. But they want these things to keep SICK HUMANS alive longer. So far, many
species have already been wiped out by the over-breeding, over-eating farm slaves. It is not likely
that these technological nations will wage a war on or "resettle" these farmers (to
where?) because the politics of the day will be against it. But they WILL probably DO something to get what they want.
The fact is, there is not enough EARTH (planet) to feed all the people on it TODAY! And Christian-Western
interference is RESPONSIBLE. If the population doubles in 30 years: then what? THANK THE GODS
for gays. Gays are generally people who DO have lives. They are INTO THINGS, they HAVE INTERESTS,
they have THEIR OWN THINGS; they are NOT just people searching for "their other half"
in order to "settle down and make more people and do the same old STASIS QUO/STATUS QUO 'family
thing'" that straights SHOULD HAVE long grown out of.
The values of the elders are NOT the values of the new generation. Often these VALUES are suffocating
hamstrings that older humans CLING TO and ENFORCE on the new generations. They do it with every
single little trivial thing, too: dancing trends and/or clothing and adornment, don't do this,
don't do that: WHY NOT? WHY get married if you do not intend to make kids? So you can get divorced
later? Marriages do not last because one or both of the partners are NOTHING PEOPLE with NOTHING
They have no THING they are into. They sit around talking small-talk, petting each other, TRYING
to like everything together, sharing the same bed and waking each other up which builds up and
causes stress if you keep getting awakened in the middle of a dream. They often TRY TO FIND something
to "get into" and, if the partner is not into it, that's the end of the relationship;
or one of the partners finds someone in the "new thing they got into" that they like
BETTER than their mate. Often they break up.
One of these herdlings might "PASS" as a loner as he seeks to FIND something to "get
into." They are NOT loners: they are LONELY. BIG difference.
An example of people really INTO something: Star Trekkies. The Trekkie is surely going to LIKE
BEING WITH another Trekkie more than he or she likes being with a non-Trekkie husband or wife
and/or non-Trekkie kids who are KIDS: too DUMB to talk intelligently. When the Trekkie GETS INTO
the show, the Trekkie is "in another world," in an ALONE PLACE that he or she goes into
INWARDLY. Forcing such a person to "pay attention to the practical affairs of the household
at hand" will produce resentment, a loss of what the Trekkie LOVES (EROS), an infringement
on the Trekkie's personal INNER SELF. Such a person should NOT GET married or HAVE KIDS unless
he or she can extricate him/herself from the "duties of the flesh at hand."
In the old days of extended families this was easy. One could have big families and STILL maintain
their time alone. Kids also tended to GO OUTSIDE and play with other kids, back then. They did
not need so much supervision and they tended to NOT BOTHER adults with "kiddie things."
Kids were SMARTER. Families were extended, yet somehow more aloof individually. The kids grew
to BE more independent inwardly AND outwardly and, of course, the earth was not overpopulated!
Here then, is the arrogance. I, who recognize the WORTH of every living creature including a
worm as being of no more or less worth than myself, I ask: WHAT WORTH are these large groups of
starving millions? They DO NOT have a life or anything worth doing or thinking about. They just
EXIST. They are CLUMPS OF MATTER that, when fed, will make MORE CLUMPS OF MATTER.
Who the hell am I to say this? Nobody. But I have things I LIKE, things I DO, things I THINK
ABOUT and create even if no one ever gets to hear it or see it. I have an INNER life. I DO NOT
see that these "worthless" hungering mouths have ANYTHING: they just EXIST.
They DON'T JUST clutter up the planet: they wreck it by trying to get something to eat so that
they can EXIST MORE and clutter things up more and MAKE more people to clutter it up and eat even
MORE. WORTHLESS unthinking THINGS. Are they even SENTIENT things?
They are not like some big important necessity to the ecosystem (like insects and fish are).
If anything, they are RUINING the ecosystem by just EXISTING! They come into technological societies
(like the U.S.A.) with no skills save the STUPID farm skills they have "working with their
HANDS." They end up being on the public dole EATING AND BREEDING at my expense. The old and
decrepit are kept alive overmuch to CONSUME; and the Christians are against abortion and infanticide.
In India life is cheap: people easily abort and perform infanticide. No one cares if the aborted
child MIGHT HAVE BEEN another Ramanajuan (THE pre-eminent mathematical genius of this century).
They especially kill/abort females because females cost more to clothe. CLOTHE? WHY WEAR clothing?
Boys grow to be workers and are cheaper to keep. Females grow up to "HAVE TO" get married.
The families have to PAY THE GROOM'S family to GET HER MARRIED OFF. Thereby begins her "life
of pure hell," and she IS better off dead. They were asked: that's what THEY SAID!
Are they unable to simply STOP DOING THIS? Yes, they are unable! They seem to be SLAVES to old
customs which are not only no longer useful, but which are a PAIN IN THEIR OWN ASSES NOW.
China seems to be the ONLY country that put into law a two-way eugenics program designed to FIX
the population and what KINDS of population they have: STOP the stupid from breeding and MAKE
the smartest breed. Since their "average" is already 20 I.Q. points smarter than anyone
in the West -- we have only to wait for super-people to come into existence. They are already
wiser than anything the West has to show: agriculture never messed them up and they have no waste-disposal
problem there. They also do not have the simpering anti-nature attitudes of the Christian West.
It doesn't matter if the worm has worth and people have worth too. Animals DO kill each other
off and they also practice infanticide. "WORTH" has nothing to do with it. Animals NEVER
mess up like man does.
Be as it may, Nature -- the planet itself, WILL fix this despite the fact that man not only REFUSES
to fix it, but tries to stop all efforts to fix it. Once before in history, 380 million years
ago, mammals started their ascent. 250 million years ago their snapping, snarling, vicious breeds
ruled the world. Then dinosaurs replaced them and they almost vanished off the earth. The few
that survived got smaller, took to NIGHT living, and got SMARTER. When dinosaurs perished, mammals
had their second chance. If dinosaurs did NOT perish, we'd not be here. Simple as that.
Copyright 1995-2003 Tani Jantsang
Visit: Satanic Reds