Note: this article is written tongue-in-cheek, intended to mock out both
Commie and anti-Commie crusaders. It is not intended as an endorsement of a
Bolshevik or Communist political agenda in the USA or anywhere else.
First a dialogue with some questions and answers from recent commentary. The
commentary arose due to this article appearing in The Black Flame (COS
Magazine). When one considers all the pro Nazi stuff and guff over that, and/or
hoolah over Hitler, interviews with Klansmen and all that, one must find it
remarkable that such guff arose over ONE article pointing out what was Satanic
in the Soviet System. It would seem that Cruxtoid propaganda is good enough
to even fool the so-called "Satanists" out there who can't think for themselves
but who react, in knee-jerk fashion, at the mere suggestion that SOMETHING Satanic
this way came. See also "COS Member from Soviet System
- on Education" on this website.
Kari Nevala who lived in a Socialist system wrote, in answer to a post:
> The people will always screw it up, because Marxism ignores
> human nature rule #1, which is:
> -- People act in accordance with their own self-interest
> Anything (be it economic, political, or metaphysical) which
> violates this principle will fail. Period, dot, end of
Without getting to what you mean by "Marxism," or what human nature is like,
why would basic "Marxism" be a violation against self-interest? As I see it,
the only way it violates the self-interests of some people is that it
doesn't give much chance to have the self-delusion of being a part of some elite.
After all, most of the people who support very elitistic systems (like for example
monarchy), do so only because it's their only way of feeling good about themselves.
Through the monarch, they can feel self-worth. Of course it is herdish at best
(gaining "worth" from being a part of the group), and delusional at best. Leftists
hated all that shit. They hated the Crown as much as they hated the Church.
Why would it be in the self-interests of people, then? If you are a worker,
as most people are, you get better rights and more money. If you are an artist
or scientist, you get to do what you do without having to worry about making
> My big problem with it is that it HAS NEVER FUCKING WORKED
> ANYPLACE IT HAS BEEN TRIED!
Again, I am not sure what you mean by Marxism, but for example many of the
Nordic countries (i.e. Denmark, Sweden, Finland) had a rather Marxist system,
and the living standards were very high (if not the highest in the world).
> Since Communism or Socialism or what-have-you places the
> welfare of the People as a group over the welfare of each
> individual, would not that be totally against what Satanism
> about, just for that alone?
What these movements have fought for, has not been to put the welfare
of the group over the welfare of the individual, but to put the welfare of the
WORKER over the welfare of the CORPORATION, Crown (nation, retarded inherited
nobility) and Church. They hated the Crown and Church so much, that they killed
the nobility and literally destroyed the Churches. Yeah, they didn't SPEAK about
"might is right" - they actually acted, used their might, to MAKE things right.
> How can a State telling you: "Labour for the good of the
> people and subvert yourself totally!" be beneficial to any
> single person?
That is capitalism! Just replace people with company. The whole essence of
leftism is to fight for the rights of the workers OVER the tyranny of the
corporations. It means better salary, better working conditions, better
health service, better education, better public services (like libraries, parks,
theaters etc.) amongst other things.
> Maybe I'm just a selfish beast, but the best incentive to
> get me to do things is for there to be benefit *to me* of
> some kind, in any given situation. I'm not thinking about
> benefiting mankind as a whole, I just want to get paid. I
> think thats pretty much hard-wired into most of the human
That's exactly the historical root of leftism. To fight to get paid
for what you do, instead of working your skin off from generation to generation
and still getting so little money that you can only barely survive. Humans are
not robots who are happy to do their dull work their entire lives. Humans want
joy and mental stimulation. Thus the people fought against tyranny of corporations,
Crown (nationalism, fascism - self-sacrifice for the good of the nationn) and
Church. It was rebellion based on a sense of self-worth. Rebellion against the
tyranny of unjustified authority.
> I do not see how one can reconcile holding oneself as the
> highest power and the State telling you what to do at the
> same time.
Exactly! Power to yourself - power to people, instead of corporations, nations
> If Communism worked, would not Cuba and China not be
> practically Third-World countries after decades of Socialist
Nordic countries (such as Denmark, Sweden and Finland) had very leftist/socialist
systems (while they had no arms industry to build up), and they had extremely
high living standards, and still do. Though the living standards aren't as high
anymore, as the capitalist forces have gained more power. Where as we used to
get paid well, have lots of free services (paid into as a pool and used as a
pool) and free time, we now get paid badly, have to work a lot more to make
ends meet, and have worse public services (many of which aren't free anymore).
Still these countries are definetly one of the top countries of the whole world,
when it comes to high living standards. (Note that no one placed an embargo
on Nordic countries or fought a Cold War with them; nor was the wealth of Nordic
countries depleted on making weapons and having an arms race. Such things destroy
any hope of Socialism being built anywhere.)
> I am -not- taking 'sides', and I have no interest in a flame
Neither do I.
> At first glance I would say that the quality of life of any
> individual is entirely dependent on that individual. One makes
> choices, and one's quality of life or level of happiness is
> the result of those choices.
I agree with this. I am not speaking for tolerance or incompetence, but the
very opposite. Let there be no privileges to help incompetent ones.
> I do not buy into the idea that some people are 'repressed'
> or 'held back' by current society or government, and
> therefore 'cannot' improve their own lives or achieve that
> which they wish to achieve.
This is true, when it comes to "most of the people living in the western world."
Still there is the fundamental question: why would I not want a higher
quality of life for me, instead of a higher quality for some corporation or
> If this 'repressed' theory was true, America would not exist.
> Think about it.
> Also, if a country is not profitable, how could those that
> live in said country be profitable?
I think it comes down to the balance between economical wealth of the state
and the happiness of the people. Both sides have their own political interest
groups. Leftists happen to be the ones in favor of enjoyable lives, while
right wing would prefer slave labor. Of course it's not that simple in practice
> However, the wealth of America has guaranteed that those
> considered to be in poverty here in America are FAR better
> off than those that are truly poor in other countries.
Yeah, life in the 3rd world would be a hell. I wonder why, and also how it
could be changed (by them). (Note: colonial exploitation - that's why.)
>I disagree in that I believe that capitalism is the only
> economic model that works; again, America is a classic example
> of this. We are the wealthiest and most powerful nation in
> the world, at present.
I don't know if this is because of Capitalism though. (Note: as a matter of
fact, it is not due to capitalism which, under Pres. Wilson, almost bankrupted
the nation and did cause a depression. During the Hoover administration, there
were massive labor strikes and fears of the collapse of capitalism, which had
proven itself to be a dismal failure. The country was saved by Roosevelt who
had to institute 8 of Marx's 10 points of Socialism: he saved the USA.)
(Another huge benefit America had in its early pioneer stages was access for
all, including the children of poor peasants, to very cheap land that
had been taken from the Native Americans - this equal access to the
means of production, agricultural land, gave people a spirit of enthusiasm
and a chance to build their lives that they would not have had in Europe,
where the land was owned by the stagnant and oppressive aristocracy. Characterizations
of the USA as having always been a paragon of pure capitalism ignore many essential
economic factors like this.)
(For real examples of nations that are more purely capitalist – i.e.,
whose governments honor wealth, the pursuit of wealth, and wealthy citizens
above all else – look to the "banana republics" of South and Central America
and Africa. Or modern Russia.)
> Capitalism is Satanic; it celebrates and rewards the
> individual. Socialism and communism reward the herd.
Capitalism rewards the corporations, not the individuals. Capitalism
is populistic and extremely herdish: it is driven by the hysterical "needs"
of the consumer herd (and the interests of the corporations). Its goal is maximal
economical profitability. Capitalism is at it's best when the workers are slaves.
On the contrary: Socialism rewards those who actually produce things. It doesn't
tolerate parasites living on the work of others. Its goal is high quality of
living and rationally guided society. Different people get different wages,
they get promoted into better positons etc just like in capitalist systems.
> Catering to those that cannot or more likely choose not to take
> care of themselves, by giving them welfare aka: re-distributing
> the wealth of the nation, denies the very essence of Satanism.
And how much is this a real issue? There naturally is no system that wants
or tolerates parasites. There are just a couple of different ways to get rid
Simple fact: more people are on welfare now, than were back then. The Socialist
system encouraged people to work. Not only were wages good, but you also got
all kinds of extra benefits. In the USSR, if you refused to work, you got sent
to the camps in Siberia. They did not tolerate parasites.
Historically, leftism was extreme activism. They were not stupid herd-minded
passive drones saying, "yes sir". They were the antithesis of that mentality.
(However, if you are looking for mindless slaves who do what they are told without
question, look no further than the typical American corporate drone or trailer
trash, who will defend capitalism as undoubtably the "best system of the world"
at the drop of a dime.)
> Satanism is about individuals. If an individual works and
> achieves and thereby gains monetary wealth, what Satanist
> would say 'nay' to that?
Yeah, exactly. See above. Individuals that work versus corporations, see above.
Satanism is a philosophy of the occult, of ideas and knowledge considered taboo
or dangerous by civilized humanity and, above all, all of its so-called "moral
teachers," from Socrates and Jesus, to Buber, Pope John, Schweitzer, et al.
In the twentieth century, perhaps no topic has been more maligned, distorted,
and reviled by the theologians, moralists, scholars, and politicians in the
Western world than the subject of Marxism, Communism, and the Stalinist Soviet
Union. When these pundits and preachers speak out against something so unilaterally
and with such rabid fervor, as they did with Darwinism and Marxism, it is almost
a sure sign that there is SOMETHING Satanic about it!
Three of the thinkers with the greatest influence on twentieth century Western
intellectual life and popular culture are Sigmund Freud, Friedrich Nietzsche,
and Karl Marx. All of these were noted atheists with damning insight into the
cherished social order and illusions of civilized humanity, and had much to
say against humanity's enshrined leaders and teachers. Freud disputed the teachings
of Moses, Nietzsche attacked Socrates and Jesus, but Marx criticized Hegel,
Jesus, you name him! Despite this, it seems that educated Satanists are familiar
with Satanic elements in the thought of Freud and Nietzsche, yet unfortunately
ignorant of such ideas in Marxism. Part of the reason for this is that in American
colloquialism, "socialism" has become synonymous with inefficient bureaucracy,
state-imposed tyranny over the personal lives of citizens, the welfare state,
and some hare-brained programs that destroyed the educational system in this
country, thanks to the efforts of certain self-hating American Leftists during
the Cold War era (who are NOW known to have been funded by the POST-Stalinist
Soviet Union, which had openly vowed to "bury" the USA!). It should be pointed
out from the start that these characterizations are inaccurate representations
and outright LIES about old-style Marxism and the social reality in the Soviet
Union under Stalin.
The basis of Marxism is a hard-bitten analysis of human society, reducing culture
to a manifestation of peoples' real-world physical environments and labor (e.g.,
what you think is determined by what you DO), and the history of civilization
to the struggle over resources (class struggle). Karl Marx is famous for his
biting observation that "religion is the opium of the masses"; in fact, Marxism
has been THE PRIMARY enemy of religion in history.
Of interest to Satanists, Marxist dialectical materialism takes the dark, entropic
force in nature (Satan) AS GIVEN. Dialectical Materialism envisions a cosmos
of constant flux where even apparent stability is only a mask of never-ceasing
forces of creation, growth, and destruction (a model validated by modern quantum
Karl Marx observed Europe in the midst of the Industrial Revolution, when Industrial
Capitalism was JUST ARISING, a world where the old classes of artisans and talented
workers were being replaced by machines, and downtrodden masses increasingly
groveled under the whim of a handful of parasitic millionaires (who often compensated
for their despicable behavior with lame moralistic "philanthropic" platitudes),
where life was SHIT and barely worth living for the vast majority of people,
and where human beings themselves became commodities sold on the market as "slaves."
Marx's idea was that once things got bad enough, the workers of the world would
wake up and UNITE to smash their arrogant overlords, and then establish a "dictatorship
of the proletariat" where THE PEOPLE ruled, instead of licking some aristocratic
asshole's dainty little high-priced feet for a pay raise. By then, capitalism
will have developed technology, factories, etc., which can then be used by the
majority under communism. Anyone who has watched the movie "Stargate" will recognize
this scenario where the humans overthrow the parasite Ra using its own technology.
One point in Marx that might be of interest to Satanists is his definition
of labor. In Das Kapital, Marx defines the value of a product biologically
(or physiologically, as Marx terms it) as "expenditure of human labor-power."
A product has no inherent value in itself; only by applying work (from humans)
does the product attain a higher value. Of course a product has value based
on its demand, but it FIRST has to be made: BY WORKERS. Work is worth the human
labor-power expended. A capitalist is one that pays a person less than what
his work is worth, that is, the capitalist does not reimburse the worker of
his expended labor-power. (Meaning that very often the workers making the product
can not even afford to buy the product for themselves, or it costs 10 or more
times what he got paid to make it.) (Compare standard of living to Scandinavian
countries - no comparison!) From a Satanic perspective, labor-power is the black
flame, which drives people to create. A capitalist is one that doesn't have
the black flame, and instead needs to derive the labor-power from someone else.
Exploitation then means to "steal" the black flame from someone. Satanists are
people that honor that black flame above all superficial trinkets. That should
put things into perspective in regards to what kinds of people are capitalists,
and what what kinds aren't.
Many of the super-rich of the Capitalist world are hungry souls driven by an
inner lacking, a black hole in their hearts, that they unsuccessfully seek to
fill with material luxury and the trappings of the "high life." (This INFINITE,
INSATIABLE greed is fundamentally different from the normal, FINITE biological
desire for happiness and pleasure.) They are truly damned people, unable to
experience the Innocent, Satanic joy a child feels eating a delicious ice cream
sundae or running through a sprinkler. These agonized people create misery in
the world because they are unable to experience joy. Some are so driven by jealousy
they seek out happy, creative people to enslave and torture. George Soros is
one such person. Like Christians, these people sometimes speak deceptively beautiful
but essentially empty maxims and doctrines (e.g., "freedom of the individual,"
an "open society") to fool people into believing them. As Satanists know, such
real-life monsters can be known not by their WORDS, but by the FRUITS of their
150 years after "The Communist Manifesto" was written, Capitalist economists
are gradually beginning to come upon the rudiments of Marxist thought, which
was Marx formulated BEFORE the American Civil War, without realizing it, and
CERTAINLY not admitting it. Right now, the cutting edge of economics is finally
incorporating EMPIRICAL real-world data, and beginning to realize that many
of the notions of "classical" economics are dead wrong. Meanwhile, Marx's correct
predictions about the inevitable tendency towards monopoly, class division (which
must NOW be seen on a global scale, with "Third World" workers at the bottom
of the barrel), and never-ceasing expansion can be verified by a glance through
the popular press. Nevertheless, Marx's prescient theories are still arrogantly
dismissed as "nonsense" or "totalitarian" by herd brainwashed by Cold War indoctrination.
The first reason why so much energy has been devoted to discrediting Marxism
in the West should be blatantly obvious to any realist asking, "Who benefits?":
America is a proudly capitalist country (despite the fact FDR instituted 8 of
Marx's 10 points from the "Communist Manifesto"), and the powers that be don't
want to be overthrown.
However, there is also a subtler and more Satanic reason why even a dirt-poor
American will give a spirited defense of the virtue of capitalism: in a Capitalist
world, Karl Marx's theory dismisses all cherished illusions that we live in
the best kind of society, that our wealth or poverty is our just deserts, etc.,
the kind of rosy ideas that many Americans (and others) find so essential to
their flimsy grip on sanity. Marxism says that not only is American consumerist
Capitalism not the "enlightened," "moral", "highest form of human civilization"
it imagines itself to be, but that, to the contrary, it is a chaotic, diseased,
confused, insanely destructive, and supremely WASTEFUL society that not only
relies on the exploitation of the less-degenerate (Islamic SHITHOLES excluded)
Third World for physical labor and places to sell its JUNK-- contrary to deluded,
bleeding-heart missionary-like liberal "humanitarians" who imagine that the
USA is really "HELPING" those people), but is also so sick that it is a dangerous,
stressful, unhealthy trash heap within its own borders, or, at best, a repressed,
Stepfordesque society of Christian consumerist clones and lunatics so broken
by their own upbringings that they cannot even enjoy the material wealth they
drain out of their colonies.
THE BIG LIE of Western capitalism and its apologists is that ONLY THEIR system
upholds human rights, rather than tramples on them; a claim that CANNOT stand
up to objective, intelligent historical scrutiny. Satanists should remember
that the period of the strongest and most adamant defamation of Communism in
the USA was during the nineteen fifties and sixties, an era when parents were
shocked by the Beatles' ONE INCH too long hair, Elvis could only be shown from
the waist up on television, social life consisted of "keeping up with the Joneses,"
et cetera ad nauseam: an era so utterly, disgustingly conformist that all its
self-deluded judgements of foreign societies are utterly and completely INVALIDATED.
Ever since its inception in 1917, when Lenin and his gang of Bolsheviks overthrew
Kerensky's asskissing government and said a big "FUCK YOU" to the Czarist royalty,
Orthodox religious establishment, and the greedy, bloodsucking capitalists of
the West, volumes have been written about the "Evil Empire," claiming to expose
the supposed failure of its famous Five Year programs, its suppression of "individual
rights," the horror of its purges, etc. However, the reader should realize that
the history of the Soviet Union has long been instinctively hidden away from
the prying eyes of the West, concealed behind a Hermetic seal of secrecy and
illusion. Now that the Iron Curtain has officially fallen, a trained eye MIGHT
discern a few GLIMPSES of this vast and utterly ALIEN empire amid the cluttered
morass of propaganda (from BOTH sides).
However, the Satanic inquirer should never forget that, contrary to foolish
American perceptions, the realms of the Soviet Union are NOT European or Western,
but Asiatic. They are not Asian as in Chinese or Japanese, but Asiatic as in
Genghis Khan and the Golden Horde, Asiatic as in Attila the Hun, Tamerlane,
Gog and Magog, Asiatic as in the Turanians, the only people who had the Dark
Doctrine in an undiluted form; this is the domain of the unknown Central Asian
Paleoarctic "Yellow Peril" before which the petty civilized Christian nations
in Western Europe trembled in abject terror, that their Popes have labeled as
Satan Incarnate and considered the people as being from "Tartarus." The manic-depressive
Winston Churchill's fanatic reactions and efforts against the Bolshevik Revolution
parallel those of Pope Leo and others to the rise of the Khans in the East in
the medieval twelfth and thirteenth centuries. This is the Asia that Western
history has tried to forget, until Vladimir Ulyanov, the son of a Kalmuck and
a Slav, overthrew the European Czar's regime and raised the Red flag over his
vast inherited empire. It is no wonder that the once cowering Capitalist Christian
West to this day considers Stalin's USSR the Devil with which HITLER had to
make a deal! This ANCIENT Western prejudice against the peoples of the Soviet
Union, which dates back at LEAST to Roman times, might explain some of the paranoia
surrounding this nation.
Note: I want to make it perfectly clear that I am NOT talking about the post-Stalinist
USSR that came into being after Khrushchev pulled a coup d'etat and decapitated
the NKVD. I will make it perfectly clear right now that this NKVD, which, under
Stalin, patrolled every economic sector to ensure honesty, is most definitely
NOT the KGB, a totally separate organization that existed alongside it, and
who were as corrupt as any state police in the USA could be corrupt without
their own department of internal affairs being there to catch them. From the
onset of Khrushchev's takeover, the economics became state capitalist; that's
NOT socialism, and it's certainly not Communism.
With that technicality aside, let us try to cover a few points about the Soviet
Union pertinent to the Satanist. Despite what American liars try to say in futile
attempts to escape the reality of their OWN wretchedly conformist lives, the
USSR was not a giant welfare state, nor was it an Orwellian empire of brainwashed
zombiefied drones (although we cannot say the same about Maoist China). Lenin's
socialist motto was "if you don't WORK, you don't EAT," and Stalin's Soviet
Union was one of the STRICTEST meritocracies in history, where people (whether
male OR female) were given their due for EVERY kind of work they did, including
the nitty-gritty manual labor that is always arrogantly sneered at by the withered
corpses in degenerate societies who fancy themselves "above" such PHYSICAL activity;
and incompetence was given no excuses. The petty classist, sexist, and racist
biases against manual, female, and (more recently) nonwhite laborers have prevented
the Western nations from EVER being anything even APPROACHING meritocracies.
Under Stalin's socialist regime, if you were going to be a dishwasher, be the
best, because you have the public health in your hands. If you were going to
be a doctor, do not hold yourself away from your patients, or talk over their
heads, because it is these people that paid for your education, and if your
knowledge does not benefit the people of your society, then it is useless. Remember,
EVERY occupation has its native jargon. Both a doctor and a dishwasher are fundamentally
responsible for public health, and both took pride in their work in Stalinist
society: this is the meaning of "from each according to their ability, to each
according to their needs." This Communist slogan does NOT mean that the physically
healthy should toil for the sake of degenerate corpse-rotten vampires. In fact,
two Stalinist epithets for such human leeches were "cannibal" and "vampire,"
and these also applied to those who made their billions on the backs of the
able-bodied people that they enslaved. Lenin's motto for the stage of Socialism
or BUILDING Communism in the Soviet Union was "from each according to their
ability, to each according to their WORK."
These demanding standards that stratified Soviet society according to natural
ability have drawn much derision from Westerners, but it is an undeniable fact
that even AFTER the degeneration after Stalin's death had set in, the USSR CONTINUED
to produce the world's finest scientists and athletes, setting a standard the
West didn't hope to even COMPARE to (much less surpass) until the USA managed
to "win" its self-initiated "race to the moon," a showpiece of propaganda for
Kennedy (the Soviets had not been competing with anyone with regards to space
travel). Nevertheless, the USSR was far ahead in all other aspects of space
science: they launched Sputnik, the first man-made satellite, had the first
cosmonaut, made the first photographs of the moon, etc. Kennedy's moon landing
was a CRASH program to CATCH UP to these historical Soviet achievements.
To this day, standard Soviet college ENTRANCE questions are sought after in
the USA by "math whizzes" and professors looking for a "genius-level" mathematical
puzzle! Unlike in America, where most scientists must grovel for research grants,
often compromising their true ideas to corporate interests or, even worse, living
in abject poverty, the Soviet Union enshrined the scientists whose work benefited
the WHOLE society, including many Satanic figures such as the defamed, derided,
and distorted Ukrainian botanist Trofim Lysenko, who was described by his Western-supported
Mendelian adversaries as a mrakobes ("demon of darkness!"), was known
to understand the plants on the fields like a shaman would, and befuddled his
enemies with an impressive gutter mouth along with a penchant for then-"cryptic"
metaphorical descriptions of life processes that have since been verified by
modern science. Despite what LIARS say now AFTER the fact, his agricultural
techniques FED the people, and he was promoted by Stalin to be the head of biological
science in the Soviet Union. Is it not coincidental that it was this country
that later honored Anton LaVey, whose ancestors hailed from these Eastern lands,
in its Museum of Atheism?
As for the much-hyped "brainwashing" attributed to the Soviet Union and other
Communist countries, such as Maoist China, Satanists should not be disappointed
to hear that the official school of psychology in the Soviet union was Pavlovianism
(not psychology at all, but neurophysiology), which is famous for its drooling
dogs and ringing bells. Stalin's regime tried to create a "New Man" by manipulation
of the social environment, removing stimuli that produce broken people and neurotic
antisocial behaviors, and encouraging those that build healthy, functional humans.
Despite what humanitarians imagine about the people in such regimes, the average
citizen of the USSR in Stalin's times did not FEEL oppressed, because they were
happy with their lives, which were affluent with material animal comfort (unlike
the average person in a stressful Hobbesian capitalist society).
In this Pavlovian school of psychology, the disassociated non-limbic "spiritual"
types of people WERE considered insane, in contrast to THIS society, where such
types are considered the "Norm," or even GLORIFIED as ROLE MODELS: neurotics
and psychotics like Mother Theresa, Winston Churchill, Cardinal Spellman, etc.
In the Soviet Union, those who showed a lack of interest in carnal life, for
example, teenage boys who weren't horny for girls, were suspected of "creeping
schizophrenia." In fact, that Pavlovian school of neurophysiology, which is
so offensive to human illusions of what B.F. Skinner called "freedom and dignity,"
is verified by recent hard-science neurology findings, such as the work of Dr.
Antonio Damasio, whose book "Descartes' Error" thoroughly discredited Western
mind-body dualism, and sparked the recent fad in "Emotional Intelligence."
As for "thoughtcrime," people were not arrested for what they thought about
the government, as the case of the Christian scientist Pavlov demonstrates:
he was never arrested, nor were people who voiced sincere discontent over policies.
However, people WERE arrested for such crimes as screwing up on important jobs,
wasting money (The People's resources!), and other things that Westerners pretend
were "trivial, innocent mistakes"---in an era of real sabotage in the face of
a war of annihilation. As such, many people who were simply emotionally confused,
unaware waste products (whose unconscious exploits fill Freud's books) were
eliminated along with avowed enemies of society. Since these unaware types fill
American society, their arrests might be seen as inhuman. We Satanists say,
"Good riddance!" Ironically, it is America's refusal to deal decisively with
some classes of such angry incompetents, destroyers, and obstructers (as the
Stalinists tried to do) that has CREATED the modern American "welfare" system
of spending billions of tax dollars for certain parasites to stay home and raise
illegitimate, unemployable and usually asocial children. However, many right
wing American politicians complain about parasites of the "welfare queen" variety.
What differentiates these right wingers from the Stalinists is that the Stalinists
targeted ALL parasites equally, instead of prosecuting only those from a certain
class or race, as Americans usually do. (One Corporation alone gets more tax-payer
funded WELFARE than all the "welfare queens" combined!)
Since the USSR was created by people who had been, by their own admission,
literally on the cultural level of New Guinea savages, their social life had
not been poisoned by the decadence typical of the civilized Western world, where
is it normal for children to hate their parents, pick on their friends, hate
themselves, repress their emotions and sexuality, et cetera (which is one reason
Westerners fail to grasp the nature of Soviet society). However, the Soviet
Union was not completely free of the degenerate types described above (as attested
to by the confused moralistic whinings of such anti-Communist "luminaries" as
Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Mikovan Djilas and the Medvedev brothers), and these
dissatisfied (with THEMSELVES) people plagued Stalin's new regime. The existence
of genuine industrial saboteurs and Vragi Naroda (Enemies of the
People) in Stalin's times is attested to by non-political and even anti-Communist
American first-hand observers, such as recorded by United States Ambassador
to the Soviet Union John Davies.
These discontents, which included both people with relatively normal motives
such as nationalism, as well as genuine mental degenerates, were dealt with
in a period of sweeping purges by the NKVD (People's Commissariat of Internal
Affairs), who were infamous in the West as agents of the Stalinist Terror, and
who were THE EPITOME of a truly Satanic police force. The NKVD was responsible
for cleaning out the garbage in Soviet society, and did so with terrifying efficiency:
they apprehended not only criminals, but also their extended families, friends,
spouses, and anyone connected with them. This sort of thoroughness strikes most
Jewish and Christian Westerners as paranoid, bloodthirsty, and excessive, but
a Satanist might note that all of those people were either physically related
to the criminal, or they associated with the criminal of their own free will.
As the saying goes, you can judge a man by the friends he keeps, and recent
scientific findings about the hereditary and familial nature of personality
and mental disease make these methods seem very reasonable, if perhaps "unethical"
by Judeo-Christian standards.
Another aspect of NKVD operations that might interest the Satanist is that
NKVD officers were not content with merely catching criminals and then presenting
evidence of their guilt and then exiling jailing or executing them. They made
the guilty admit the reality of what they did and then insisted that they admit
WHY they did it. Of course, after many denials of "I didn't do it," the guilty
ones came clean (the innocent were let go, but one never hears about the innocent
in propaganda). This is the Satanic, Asian "Durga" method of forcing someone
to not just spit out a phony excuse but painfully dig into their souls to remember
what DESIRE compelled them to commit crimes against their society, which often
involved seeing some buried awful TRUTH about oneself, a process to which most
people would find DEATH preferable. Sometimes these criminals would be brought
before the citizenry and international media for "show trials," where they would
publicly confess to what they had done and why. Western scholars usually dismiss
these trials and confessions as faked, but, for one example, experienced lawyer
John Davies considered the testimony at the famous Bukharin trial to be genuine,
and he was a first-hand observer who had no political agenda or reason to distort
The NKVD was the internal police force of the Soviet Union that fought corruption
and prevented counter-revolution, and when Khrushchev had his violent coup
d'etat after Stalin's death, the first thing he did was dismantle it in
order to instate his poisonous state-capitalist programs. From then on, Communism
was doomed in the Soviet Union, and life there was not the same and destined
to get increasingly bad. The Soviet economy (which was already severely crippled
by World War 2) was strained to collapse by excessive military expenditure in
the Cold War. All of Khrushchev's rhetoric about de-Stalinization and the "crimes"
of Stalinism were a COVER for his vile destruction of the USSR, and people who
had lived through the era of a man who had made their country great, despite
poverty and a war that wiped out one third of their new industrial achievements,
were horrified to hear him derided as a criminal.
According to the recently published memoirs of Anatoly Dobrynin, former member
of the Central Committee of the Party and Soviet Ambassador to Washington for
24 years (1962-1986), Gorbachev, the West's little "hero," is as much to blame
for the collapse of the Soviet Union as Khrushchev. Dobrynin says that Khrushchev
kept antagonizing the U.S. military (this kind of antagonism doesn't work for
a SOCIALIST system) and this misdirected Soviet energies to war, (instead of
building their Socialist society) while Gorbachev's "wonderful reforms" (as
the West thinks) unleashed chaos and confusion that Dobrynin says Gorby, could
not even understand or deal with. Gorby was too hasty and did not understand
economic problems (as Stalin DID), and became increasingly helpless as "glasnost"
progressed. According to Dobrynin, Gorbachev did not know how to deal with "practical
problems" (sound familiar?). Now Mikhail Gorbachev works in Pizza Hut commercials.
Let us not forget that WWII destroyed almost everything the Soviets under Stalin
had built. An arms build up is not the way to build socialism; it anything it
Now that the Iron Curtain has fallen, the many detractors of Communism have
loudly proclaimed the victory of "freedom of the individual" and "democracy."
Meanwhile, the former Soviet Union has become a Hobbesian cesspool of massive
starvation, crime, and all of the other HELLISH results of confused humans struggling
for survival (however, it is not nearly as bad as EVERY SINGLE American inner
city is; of course, the capitalists won't be happy until it is). The nation
that rose from literally MEDIEVAL social and technological conditions to become
a world superpower, to build the world's first space station, and to give HOPE
of a better future for humanity, has been degraded to a level where its former
General Secretary can be seen on American television peddling for Pizza Hut.
THIS is where the "free market" road to profit incentives and unnecessary "luxuries"
(of consumer SUCKERISM where people don't even enjoy the JUNK, such as the HIDEOUS
$150 sneakers popular with school-age ghetto dwellers and their selfless imitators)
They, or more correctly, those fools and saboteurs who bought into the Western
web of Capitalism (definition: the greedy, desperate searching after material
TRINKETS by those attempting to fill up a black VORTEX inside themselves), have
brought the Soviet Union: to utter DEGENERACY, REAL bread lines, a society without
even medical care, and, of course, a resurgence of Christianity. Like most people,
the citizens of what was once Genghis Khan's empire, the impenetrable wilderness
unknown to the degenerate temperate zone civilizations, have been deceived by
the shiny, deceptively pretty SHELL and tried to snatch up the shiny and glamorous
but illusory "treasures" of Capitalism (just like the "treasures" of Christianity)
they offer, only to find crumpled-up FOIL in their hands, or at least SOME of
them have bought into this NOTHINGNESS. Perhaps when it is too late, once they
are past the point of no return and are spiraling uncontrollably into oblivion,
when they have long since sealed their own fates, they will look back and realize
that they too have forsaken something more valuable than any ugly, overpriced
"designer" suit or rip-off skimpy, bland "gourmet" cuisine in the world: normal
creature comfort, good food, loving friendship and family, the kind of things
NKVD chief Felix Dzerzhinsky called life, happiness, and inner liberty (Dzerzhinsky
had never heard of Jefferson), and that we Satanists call vital animal existence.
Maybe they will realize that it IS possible to have a life with material comfort
and luxury and real friends and family as communal primitives do, and have it
(as Gene Roddenberry dreamed) in a MODERN technological society.
Right now, the greedy klippoths in the American capitalist world have had their
wildest dreams fulfilled, their own big businesses are moving their operations
OVERSEAS, into the labor markets newly-opened by the fall of Communism, gradually
depleting the once prosperous standard of living in even the so-called First
World. A Satanist might have warned them, "Be careful what you wish for: you
just might GET IT."
1. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, "The Communist Manifesto."
2. Ludo Martens, "Another View of Stalin." (Link Available on http://www.geocities.com/redcomrades/index.html
3. John Cassidy, "The Return of Karl Marx." New York Times, October
20&27 1997, pages 248-259.
4. Bruce Bower, "Yours, Mine, and Ours." _Science News_, Volume 153, March
28, 1998, pages 205-207.
5. Arthur Koesstler, "Darkness at Noon."
6. John Davies, "Mission to Moscow" (see also movie with same title).
7. J.D. Bernal, "Science in History," (1954): second ed., Watts, 1957; 3rd
ed. 1965, also Penguin pb. (Third ed. is the best edition).
8. J.D. Bernal, "The Biological Controversy in the Soviet Union and its Implications,"
Modern Quarterly 4 (Summer 1949), 203-217.
9. J.D. Bernal, "The Abdication of Science." Modern Quarterly 8 no.1
10. Rius, "Marx for Beginners."
11. "Stalinist Terror: New Perspectives" edited by J. Arch Getty and Roberta
12. Stalin and Yezhov
- an Extra-Paradigmatic View by P. Marsh (on http://www.geocities.com/redcomrades/index.html
Copyright 1995-2003 Proletariat
Visit: Satanic Reds