What is NETER?

by Tani Jantsang

P&P (Peter Gilmore/Peggy Nadramia referred to as PG or PN herein) printed out posts and literature and asked me to comment on what I know of this. At the time, the CoSatan was having an org war with the ToSet. I have to admit that while I read all the CoSatan literature (and I mean all of it, not just the books), I was only shown very little of the ToSet literature - and I was shown it by P&P, the people having the org war with them. ToSet does not make their org literature public. So please keep that in mind!

What is NETER? By Tani

(From AE Wallis Budge: Hieroglyphic Dictionary)
neter: the word in ALL texts of ALL periods is in general use to mean God or a god. neteru: means gods (plural!). Neterti: a god in the Tuat (no jokes please). The Tuat is "the everlasting and hidden." And so forth, LOTS of listings.

Of note.
Neter: a SERPENT-GOD who bestowed godhood on the dead.
Neter aa: A two-headed winged serpent with a tail terminating in a human head; a three headed winged serpent with two pairs of human legs.
Neter ua: the god One, a title applied to ANY god and even ANY GODDESS.
Neter mut: a title of Isis.
Neter nuti: the god of the town, the local god.
Neter-neteru: a singing god. And so forth, etc. (Budge).
Like "Neter Amon": The hidden one. That which abides in all things; the soul of all emanated phenomena. This was symbolized by the Ram. Amon Ra would be the Boundless Darkness and the Light/Vajra within. Amon Ra is a very Eastern concept.

According to Carleton S. Coon, forensic anthropologist (despite one wrong but trivial assumption he made, he was pretty good), in "Racial Adaptations," the first Egyptians were Negro. According to more recent excavations it can be clearly shown that they were some kind of North African Negro race mixed with something else that gave them an oriental cast.

According to all the best known Egyptology experts including TeVelde (SETH, GOD OF CONFUSION) the "later" but still very early Egyptians used "SET" to apply to the various clans that claimed descent from Seth or Set. Seth is the only remaining son of Adam in the Adam and Eve legend. Egyptians (such as Manetho, for one eg) wrote that Set gave birth to the Ishmaelites and Israelites. So it is clear what Egyptians used the word Set to mean: the people WE would call SEMITES. TeVelde notes that Egyptians had the first anti-Semitism and their own manner of using "Set" proves this, which corresponds to deeds they simultaneously did.

Later on in Egypt, during the 18th dynasty period, many Semites were IN Egypt as can be seen by their faces drawn with Semitic features and profiles. Still, Set or Seti was used as a prefix or suffix to denote anything that was Semite-Egyptian.

Much later, the Ptolemies ruled Egypt and these people were not Semites but were a mixture of the original Pelasgian and "semi-Aryan" Achaean stock and Dorian/Spartan stock. The Dorians/Spartans, the only "Aryans" to invade and wreck Greece, destroyed the Hellenic civilization. Spartans were Dorians.

Let's be specific: if anyone was pro-Arab and anti-Jewish, then they can hardly have been anti-Semitic since Arabs are the purest Semites around. There was no such thing as "A JEW" as a widely known appellation during the days of the Seti (SEMITE) rulers of Egypt (hence the appellation SETI to refer to ANYTHING OF SETH - the clans of Seth, son of Adam). There were Israelites and Ishmaelites, Judah was but one of twelve tribes of these people. But there was no such thing as "A JEW" widely known to outsiders, because the ISRAELITES were not amalgamated under the rulership of the JUDEANS until around 700 BC. These Jews only came to rule what clans remained of the ISRAELITES IN CAPTIVITY under the Assyrians, or "Babylonians" as Jews might call them. Hence, no tribes of Israelites were "lost" either, they amalgamated IN CAPTIVITY under Judah, as JUDEANS, hence the name. Jews never called ANYTHING "Set" except, perhaps, themselves very long ago before their ancestors were called Jews, before they were even called Israelites or Ishmaelites. They may have had a severe and exclusive JHVH deity, but among themselves their history was one of clan warfare with the patriarchists trying to stamp out the matrilineal clans. (See Patai, "Hebrew Goddess.") Jews to this day are matrilineal so we know WHO WON. They did not have a god of extermination because they did not preach to others or convert others, and still don't.

Christians take the Bible myths as defacto history. Jews don't do this! But who does? The Christians do and the Fundamentalists Christians take all of it word for word as fact. Most Jews today aren't even fully Semites. But ARABS are Semites and Egyptians are PREDOMINANTLY Semitic. In fact, according to Cavalli-Sforza on the human genome project, from looking at genetic samples, the Ethiopians are about 60% Semitic and 40% African.

It was not the Israelite states or the pre-Israelite states that were agricultural bee-hives. The Egyptians, obviously during their own pre-Semitic period, hated ANYTHING "Semitic" as can be seen in TeVelde (SETH, GOD OF CONFUSION), the most scholarly book on Set out there (the one PG gave us because he was unable to understand it himself). And it was also these (non-Jewish-Israelite) agricultural Semites that the Pythagorean clans of PELASGIAN people didn't get along with either.

The Pentacle: It was absolutely these Pythagorean clans that used (and STILL USE) the pentacle, just as it is used in Satanism. To call this the Pentacle of Set is incorrect. Neither Semites nor Egyptians used the pentacle, generally. King Solomon may have used it. The entire system of Fives was exclusively and ubiquitously Eastern AND Pythagorean - which is noted by scholars to be Eastern, despite Hellenic Civilization being considered the foundation of Western Civilization. The Egyptians NEVER used the pentacle! The people in India and Greece surely did and the Pythagorean Masons and Eastern Star STILL use it!

The ubiquitous Set was a wild onogaur. Donkeys figure all the time in the Old Testament as favorable and Jesus rode in on one: back then that was a statement. See our Set article. In Israel today, they chose this as their national animal or something like that.

The ONLY Leviathan or Serpent-Dragon idea in Egyptian thought was that of Apep or Apopis, a true "devil" idea: TeVelde agrees. Leviathan means "twisting coiling Serpent" EXOterically. The Serpent-Dragon symbol is still ubiquitous in the EASTERN places and among the EASTERN clans. These people are the CREATORS of Hellenic thought. All philosophers agree, with Martin Bernal making a push for the acceptance of AFRICAN Egyptian influence to be included: he's alone in his ideas because the thought, the language and subtlety of it were PURELY Eastern. If anything, Eastern thought influenced Egyptians, not the other way around. Egyptians didn't travel much, especially over sea. Eastern nomads were NOMADS and surely were in Egypt along WITH those Sethites/Hebrews. The term HAPIRU, applied to these non-Egyptian people and these Sethites, means STRANGER in Egyptian. Among the Hapiru (strangers) were the Danae who were PELASGIANS and the ARGOI whose descendents are today in the country Georgia.

"Set" plus the Hebrew word "en" is Satan. According to PG and PN, the ToSet claims this. Could Satan come from "Set" and the Hebrew "en?" In Hebrew and in all Semitic languages, "EN" means "not" or "no." It is a negative particle. In Hebrew there were specific names for principles or messengers of JHVH like Moveth or -ael or -el as a suffix as in Sam-AEL or Azaz-EL. EL means God and would be in front of the word, like ELoha ELohim. This was clearly explained in the first portion of our article on Serpents versus Adamites and included the GENDER of the word, important in Hebrew.

Why did the TOS choose Set out of all those deities when any professor of Theology would easily be able to tell him that a Prince of Darkness concept would be better served by THOTH, AMON, HERMES or even ANUBIS, i.e., the concepts we always had. An outright Dark Chaotic Dragon concept would be Apep. Why? Why Egypt? As Martin Bernal points out in "Black Athena," Christians have always been fascinated by ooo ahh Egyptoid mysteries. Egypt was a theocracy complete with the practice of making mummies and building huge stone pyramids to put them in (exhausting their resources and using slaves to do this). This is what one might epithetically call primitivism and superstition. Even their hieroglyphics were primitive compared to the ALPHABETS that existed in India and Greece. In fact, this "Egyptoid" stuff was not Egyptian at all: it was purely Eleusinian Mysteries encoded by Freemasonry as Lefkowitz points out in her argument with Martin Bernal.

In the second part of our Set article, we elaborate on the Pythagorean tradition regarding Set - which in that was equated with Jesus! Also, there is information on Set, the ancient WORD meaning Sirius, was explained in the first part our article on Set. The IDEAS were put forth, but not WHO put them forth. Who had these ideas about Sirius:

Egypt's entire most-ancient focus on Sirius came from S.W. Africa from the earliest people who migrated there: AFRICANS! The early Egyptian prefix "SO" or "ZO" or "ZA" (as in Soser) is the same as the one used in Songhay, a huge empire in S.W. Africa, very old, written about when it was still there by ibn Battuta in graphic detail: a true CITY OF GOLD and probably where King Solomon's gold originated from. ("Tropical Heritage," by Lady Lugard has much on this ancient nation.)

What the Pythagorean and also Masonic "Egyptian" mysteries is all about is really ELEUSINIAN Mysteries. In these, Osiris is the GOD OF NYSA (Nysa is in N.W. INDIA): DIONYSUS, and GREEK LANGUAGE FORMS of Egyptian deity names are taken and USED AS characteristics of "man in tune." "We" might be using Egyptian-sounding names in Greek language form, but "we" are NOT talking about ANYTHING Egyptians EVER conceived of. Set doesn't exist in this tradition: AT ALL, except as "Jesus" later on, or "dysfunctional man" early on!

The OLDEST form of Satan might be gleaned from two pre-Sanskrit (Naga) words: SAT (the apeiron of the Pythagoreans, a boundless darkness that is ALL and immutable, Being) and TAN (the stretching forth of this darkness infused into all that exists, and ALWAYS categorized in FIVE WAYS, Becoming). The five is UBIQUITOUS in the East. And the FIVE was the MAIN THING in Pythagorean DARK doctrine. (The Light is divided up into 7 emanations and constitutes the Septenary system.) The pentacle is like a master glyph whereby all things or principles or MECHANISMS of nature are encoded. We use it in the same way that one would use numbers (from the Sanskrit to the Arabic to us) to do their income taxes! It's so automatic that you don't even realize that you are using a base-10 system or MET-ric system. This was also big in Pythagoreanism and was also used in India. ROMANS NEVER HAD IT.

What did, indeed, come out of ANCIENT Egypt, and by that I mean AFRICAN Egypt which was called KHEM, was CHEMISTRY hence the name from Khem to the Arabic word to the word we use today. 200 years of European lies about this "racial" business are being slowly uncovered by new excavations and HONEST archaeology without shams like what happened in Zimbabwe (they destroyed the finds, covered up who built the place).

This is not about race but, WHO is it that HAD SPDT (Set) in ancient Egypt as SIRIUS? AFRICANS DID! They had the SAME doctrines as the Songhayans. They called the highest mysteries of this "SO DAYI." The Hebrews called the mysteries "SOD-IHOH." There were Semitic people down that far in Africa as can be seen by genetics and even ancient linguistics. Hence the old term for the language "Hamito-Semitic" is now "Afro-Asiatic." MUCH later (thousands of years later) in Egypt different people were mixed in with the originals as can be seen by the way they LOOKED. Seti rulers ALL look Semitic! But they weren't Jews.

Jews, when they were JEWS (JUDEANS from Judah, his tribe) didn't like these Egyptians much but they'd surely never take the name of their OWN FOREFATHER and call it a devil! SETH! Adam and Eve, remember? Cain murders Abel. Abel has no kids. Cain is wiped out by the flood. NOAH is left and he's from SETH! Is something not clear, here?

See post on COS vs. TOS and the philosophical impossibility of one deriving from the other (or even being related in this way). From what I have read of literature printed for public or member education, I see no relation between the two organizations.

The Christians took a Jewish criminal or prophet or rebel named Yeshua ben Pandira of Notzri or Yeshua bar Yosef (either or) and made him into a God. They took some possibly non-existent people and created "authors for other chapters" about their God. (See "Refuting Missionaries" FROM a Jewish Rabbi written TO OTHER Jewish Rabbis on this and "not for Christian eyes." One will notice that when Jews talk to Christians they treat these "authors" as if they do exist. That's called keeping secrets. That's called NOT SHARING with enemies.) What TOS seems to have done is take the Adamic Forefather Seth and TURN HIM into a God and then called it Satan! Perhaps they don't know that Set or Seth is connected this way. I see nothing to indicate they knew this. (What I read came from PG). Also in Set article we sell we show what the Sethian Heresy is - where people in that group believe Jesus to be the reincarnation of Seth or Set.

The Christians did the same even so their Jesus myth is a myth about a Jew: they called the Jews DEVILS! And why? Because the Jews did exactly what we Satanists did: REFUSE to become Christians (and a Christian by ANY NAME is still a Christian). What's not to see?

The TOS apparently speaks a lot about "outcast" feelings. I've seen no literature on this, but have seen things printed out from posts shown to me by P&P. What is this outcast alienated feeling they are talking about in these posts? REPRESSION. That's ALL it is! It causes a person to dissociate. So they FEEL this way. Sure it's a mystery to them. Psychoanalysts have known this for years and now neurology has DEFINED it. Believe it or not: I'm NOT intending to flame.

NO ONE NEEDS to listen to Dr. Aquino's version OR the COS version about "what happened." Not necessary! Come on, the two orgs hate each other. All one needs to do is look at the PRESENT philosophy and look at the ORIGINAL Satanic Bible and what LaVey wrote in published articles back then. Look at the first thing Dr. Aquino wrote. JUST LOOK. I have to admit I've seen all of the COS stuff, but only samples of the TOS stuff. I have seen all of what Dr. Aquino wrote whilst in the COS for public reading. One can then, like archaeologists do, KNOW what happened without having to hear their diametrically opposite versions of "what happened." What use is that? Each side calls the other side a liar. So then, push aside that data as irrelevant. LOOK at what I said to look at: THE DEEDS, the PUBLISHED WORDS (which constitute deeds as the INTENT IS for people to read it). From this alone, a solid picture can be formed. It's clear provided you can get your hands on ALL the published material that is intended to be read by those in each organization. You know, archaeologists don't have ancient people to go and ASK what they fought a war about. They do it SCIENTIFICALLY, by analysis. And of course, 200 years of bogus Euro-bullshit is being blown apart. It's EASY to see what went on in 1970's COS. No need even to dig or excavate! JUST READ IT. See also post by Marsh on Evolution. It is not easy to see what ToSet doctrines are now and keep in mind, what I was shown as "their doctrines" was shown to me by their enemies.

What is this Gift of Set they talk about? It has the something to do with the human brain or consciousness. First of all, enough IS known about the human brain and genes now to conclusively show that NO tinkering by anyone or anything occurred. H.sapiens are only one of many offshoots that diversified after coming down out of trees due to a climatic change. Presumably, though this is not certain, only one of these ancient Hominids survived and the others perished: many of whom (Neandertals) had BIGGER BRAINS than we do today. The survivor is Sapiens, going on the premise that no others survived and evolved, and assuming that Sapiens did not mix with anyone else that was previously there. From there on, Sapiens diversified (as all things do) and we have RACES as a result. Climate causes this: absolutely. Then selective breeding in an isolated area encourages it: you get another race.

Some ToSers maintain that they KNOW there is evidence of an intelligent entity tinkering around with man's brain (from a post a Setian made, shown to me by PG). There is no evidence for this AT ALL in reality. TOS states that some humans sense this potential and they are the Elect (the Born Agains say the same exact thing: they are the Elect, the Saved, but then what do the CoSers mean by Alien Elite?). The only real evidence of a any of the FEELINGS that result in this kind of thinking, on the part of anyone, is a peculiar kind of cognitive DISABILITY that makes these people repressed and unable to think in any kind of logical form. They WANNABE special. Neurology has defined this as : anosognosic. When Christians step outside this reality boundary and try to impose their delusions on others as "the truth, empirical facts" they show themselves to be psychotic. They all imagine they think precisely, but they think in profuse confusion.

Does ToS think they have identified the mythical "fall of man and state of sin" and then play with the Patriarch Set or Seth, Adam's son, and call it their god? And remarkably, do they imagine that Jews think this is Satan? AMAZING! Perhaps they refer to Sati? That's not Set!! From literature given to me by a pro CoS person, they seem to think that "Becoming" is something unique.

It is definitely the ATHEISM of some Satanists that ToSers hate so much. It is the ATHEISM of Satanists that makes me see them as fools in black robes with a hang up on the word "satan."

It might surprise all these people to know that INSECTS are the true masters of this planet and its most INTELLIGENT survivors. They have skillfully MASTERED everything humans have tried to do and FAILED. Would anyone imagine that Beelzebub tinkered with insects? No one I know would think this except as a JOKE.

IF something can truly be objectively seen as the FALL of man then I can find something real, absolutely real: the loss of the estrus! Humans did not just climb down from trees and take to land. Humans definitely have an Aquatic adaptation and have (still have) every single peculiar thing that you'd EXPECT to find in any other aquatic mammal, and NOT find in any land-only mammal! Something catastrophic happened with climate (the Pleistocene) to force our ancestors to leave some ideal environment, which tends to produce MORE creative, intelligent and playful variants than the same related species that stayed on land. And so man took to the forests once again, by land and not by tree. All cultures know of the Golden Age. And man had to pick fruit from trees and keep moving inland to get more fruit from trees. And they had to do agriculture (part of the Adamic curse! backbreaking hellish work.) Somewhere along the line, no one knows when, man lost the estrus and that's no small thing. In terms of a STRICT biological view, man BEGAN to go extinct. Man (hominids) has only been here a few million years, Sapiens only maybe two hundred thousand years, and we STILL HAVE these aquatic adaptations. But a few million years is nothing but the blink of the eye of geology. Theory: Various types of humans took to this new land-based change in different ways. The State of Sin or Adamic curse seems to be that SOME of them never managed to feel part of the Web of Life after this happened to them, they continued to feel as if they lost their home: alienated. They ate fruit from trees? Apples? Cut off the Tree of Life? They ARE NOT the "Knowers of Wisdom!" It's all theory, but the estrus loss is not a theory. It's a fact.

Be as that may be, the real clinical cause of such a feeling of disassociation is one simple thing: REPRESSION and the attempt to "be in control of things" by using the mind and stunting the body. This only produces (and this can be PROVEN) humans with NO logic at all. It produces motor retarded people. Eventually these people will become less and less fertile (this has happened now and IS noted). They will begin to develop psychosomatic diseases and behave in ways not suitable for a human animal to behave (such as stop eating meat). This also has been noted. It's happening but only to specific groups of people.

According to the Christians, a literal Serpent/Devil cursed these Adamites. Jews have no such literal meaning at all. So then, is TOS saying that the Serpent/Devil didn't curse them but really blessed them instead? If one takes the myth at face value and then looks at these people, one would HAVE to agree with the Christians: the Serpent cursed them to be people adverse to their own carnal bodies, to feel alienated and outside of the Web of Life that IS Nature, and to forever be without logic and so confused that they think their ramblings ARE logic. We merely agree with the Jewish scholars on this issue. The Nagas (Serpents) taught the Middle Eastern people agriculture and metallurgy: and they thereby ruined their land! That's the truth! There was no literal Serpent unless this refers to a RACE OF PEOPLE KNOWN back then as NAGA, which means Serpent. Did one of us also tell these people to eat fruit from trees? Maybe so! But it's hard to imagine that they did NOT get the idea from seeing CHIMPS eating fruit from trees even further back in remote times. We are not part of the Adamic race or Seth's people. We are those other people who went our own way and never felt alienated or apart from the Web of Life. And that's in our oral tradition!

The one truly MAJOR change in terms of evolution was when a protostome flip flopped and became a deuterostome. Two other MAJOR big deals in evolution were the doubling of chromosomes. But this all happened before there were any life forms with heads or jaws. Nothing much that has happened since then is "remarkable." Of course the Oxygen Revolution was a major change and yet there are still some survivors from this (anaerobic bacteria). Yet no one would imagine that a GOD wiped away the old atmosphere and replaced it with the new. Only a MORON would think that. When someone, not a moron (very low IQ), lives in the 20th century and can't seem to GRASP the fundamental basics about biology and the way life works, then he has a COGNITIVE DISABILITY. Such types of people tend to dream up ideas about Gods such as the Fundamentalists and some others do. These people are laboratory tested anosognosic types. They, unlike other disabled people who can SEE their disability, are disabled in a way not AS visible. The fact is, many such abnormalities are INvisible: genetic ones. They have to be laboratory tested. These cognitively disabled types are NOT all that hard to spot: they can't read texts, they can't synthesize but when they try they dream up lunacy that can be empirically proven to be false. You can repeat something to them 100 times and they seem unable to HEAR it: anosognosic, all the data is not GETTING INTO their whole brain. Finally, if they do understand what you are saying, they realize how different you are. Seldom do they realize that it is THEY who are disabled and talking nonsense. Prove it to them in a lab and they'll fall back on RELIGION. They "BELIEVE." FAITH! Their "salvation" is Logos (words, logic)!

END.

Visit: Satanic Reds